Software for the workyour team still doesbetween systems.
If someone repeatedly compares files, updates records, checks documents or keeps information in sync between business tools, Reativei builds the small missing workflow.
Keep your ERP, CRM and the rest of your stack.
- spreadsheet
- portal
- document
Five inputs. One workflow.
Humans only where judgment is needed.
Five recurring sources used to be assembled and checked by hand every week. Now software assembles the data and applies explicit rules — only the cases that need judgment reach a person, and one reviewed status package comes out.
- Customer order export
- Vendor portal export
- Internal ERP export
- BOL/POD documents
- Operations tracker
Does your workflow look like one of these?
Different companies use different tools. We look for the same pattern: a repeatable step that still needs a person to carry information from one place to another.
Cross-system handoff
Document-to-system process
Spreadsheet that became an application
Good Reativei projects are specific enough that off-the-shelf software does not cover the workflow cleanly.
Small operational systems, demonstrated.
Each one is a fixed-scope build around a single exception queue. Open the browser demo to see the shape — fictional data, runs in your browser, no sign-up.
SERVICE BILLING
Completed, approved, priced and coded orders post automatically. The exceptions wait in one clear queue.
See the billing queue →THREE-WAY MATCH
Routine matches post for payment. Quantity, price, missing-receipt and missing-PO mismatches wait for a person.
See the match queue →PROJECT CLOSEOUT
Approved, documented, in-budget records post automatically. Sign-off, change-order, documentation and budget blockers wait in the queue.
See the closeout queue →Each is a small fixed-scope system — not a generic automation platform.
Have one small workflow you want gone now?
A Quick Fix removes one narrow manual workflow — the weekly export, the reconciliation, the copy-paste, the exception check — without a long project and without touching your existing systems.
Is this a good first project?
A good first project usually has most of these properties.
Good first project
- It happens repeatedly
- It crosses multiple tools, files, portals or documents
- There is one clear operational output
- Routine cases follow understandable rules
- Unusual cases can stop for human review
Probably not a fit
- A mature product already solves it cleanly
- The process is mostly judgment or relationship work
- The company already has its own team building and maintaining internal tooling
If an existing product is the better answer, we'll say so.
Three steps. One clear output.
Small software projects should not require months of discovery meetings.
Map
We map the workflow as it runs today — inputs, systems, rules and output — and define the boundary of the build.
Output: workflow map + defined boundary
Build
We implement against realistic cases, from agreed access to a working build.
Output: working implementation against realistic cases
Test + launch
We test edge cases, get your approval and hand the workflow over to your team.
Output: approved workflow + documentation + handoff
Start small. Fix one workflow.
A clear starting point for small operational systems. Larger integrations are scoped separately.
One narrow operational workflow with defined inputs, rules, output and handoff. Most first projects fit inside this range.
Have one narrow workflow you want gone now?
A Quick Fix removes a single small manual workflow — starting at US$750, usually delivered within a few business days.
What makes a project larger
- Number and complexity of interfaces
- Document and data complexity
- Rule and exception complexity
- Write access vs. read-only/export workflows
What the first build includes
- Working implementation
- Agreed integrations
- Testing against realistic cases
- Documentation and handoff
- Defined post-launch support period
You receive the fixed implementation price before the build starts.
Show us the manual step →Built directly with the person doing the work.
Reativei is founder-led. You work directly with Vinicius from workflow mapping through implementation, testing and handoff.
The studio deliberately focuses on small company-specific operational systems rather than broad software transformation projects.
Straight answers to the questions that matter.
What you receive, what you own, what it costs, and what happens after launch.
Why not use an existing product?
Sometimes that is the right answer. Reativei is for the company-specific remainder that existing ERP, CRM, SaaS or automation tools do not cover cleanly. Standard products may still be used inside the implementation when appropriate.
What access or integrations do you need?
- Sample data or exports first, where practical.
- APIs preferred when available.
- Email, files and exports can also be interfaces.
- Least-privilege, read-only access preferred.
- Production write access only when actually needed and explicitly scoped.
Where a step benefits, AI can help interpret documents or classify requests — but rules, approvals and critical actions stay explicit and reviewable.
What do we receive, and who owns/hosts it?
A working implementation of the agreed workflow — the software, agreed integrations, documentation and a clean handoff, plus a defined post-launch support period. The fixed-scope proposal states the hosting and ownership model before the build starts.
What does a first build cost, and how long does it take?
A single narrow workflow can often be handled as a Quick Fix, starting at US$750 and usually delivered within a few business days. A typical first build beyond that is US$2,500–5,000. Most small workflows run roughly 1–3 weeks, though integration complexity can change that. No long-term Reativei contract is required. Any third-party or optional ongoing cost — hosting, services or licenses — is stated before the build.
What happens when the process changes?
- Small adjustments can be handled under an agreed support arrangement.
- Larger changes are re-scoped as new work.
- Documentation is included with the handoff, so the system is maintainable.
FIRST STEP
SHOW US THE MANUAL STEP.
One or two sentences is enough. Tell us what starts the process, which tools are involved and what someone still does by hand. We'll tell you whether a small build looks worthwhile and what we would need to confirm.
No system access or files are needed for this first step. If custom software is not the right answer, we'll say so.